Ethernet edu et 2016 Result login (Exit Exam 2024)
The expected responses have been prompted by Ethiopian institutions’ undergraduate students’ dismal performance on the first-ever exit assessment examinations. Just 61,054 of the registered 194,239 candidates who took the test two weeks ago were able to achieve the necessary 50 percent and above to get their bachelor’s degrees, making up 40.65 percent of all potential graduates out of the 150,184 qualified candidate grads. Samuel Kifle, Ph.D., the state minister of education, presented a briefing last week that included some statistics that revealed a mixed bag of findings, with students at public institutions outperforming those at private colleges. While just 17.23 percent of the 72, 203 students from private higher education institutions passed the test, about 62.5 percent of the 77, 981 students from 44 public universities who took the final evaluation passed it. These alarming statistics have unsettling ramifications that need serious thought from everyone involved.
MENU
- Ethernet edu et 2016 result login exit exam 2024 link
- Ethernet edu et 2016 result login exit exam 2024 download
- https //result.ethernet.edu.et login
- exit exam.ethernet.edu.et login password
- moe exit exam login
- result ethernet edu et 2015 login password
- https //result.ethernet.edu.et placement
- moe exit exam login password
The Ministry of Education announced in April 2022 a plan to implement exit exams in all undergraduate programs beginning in the 2022–2023 academic year. The plan claimed to be a component of a sectoral reform whose main objective was to establish an environment that would enable universities to carry out their mission effectively and efficiently and to become a source of knowledge, research, and innovation. Experts in the field at the time said that the ministry’s decision was a sign of growing disenchantment with Ethiopia’s subpar tertiary education system. They also said that the move was spurred by hopes that the programme would encourage students to work hard and succeed rather than resort to widespread exam cheating. It’s important to discuss the experts’ diagnosis of the issue and their suggested remedies here, given the scope and complexity of the situation.
Experts have long maintained that one of the main causes of the sad condition of higher education in Ethiopia is the country’s 1994 education strategy, which placed more emphasis on rapidly increasing the country’s educational coverage. Unquestionably, the strategy has had some good effects since it was put into place, even in spite of the many internal and external obstacles it has encountered. Its struggles have included, among other things, the clear politicisation of the educational system, which has undermined meritocracy and accountability; a lack of resources and facilities for learning; corruption; and subpar working conditions and conditions for teachers. As a consequence, even if the exit test findings are concerning, viewers who had been concerned about the hazards these elements presented for decades were not shocked by them.
Of course, the implementation of the exit examinations has raised concerns about whether they were ever necessary in the first place. Exam proponents contend that the tests are necessary to determine if aspiring graduates have met the goals set out in the course materials. They argue that if the tests are designed to serve as an accurate benchmark for gauging the quality of postsecondary education, then there are a number of advantages to be gained from them. Some benefits the defenders of exit exams point to include: restoring trust in a failing higher education system; improving the declining quality of education and reviving it; establishing an accountability and transparency system that allows academic leaders, instructors, and higher education institutions to be evaluated for their successes or failures; giving universities vital information on the overall quality of their system in order to prioritise high-quality instruction and thereby increase their competitiveness; and enabling employers to assess the performance and potential of recent college graduates that they wish to hire.
Opponents, however, point to a number of factors that they believe make exit examinations superfluous or even ineffective. They question whether an exit test can fairly assess a student’s knowledge of cross-disciplinary subjects or a specific subject. Additionally, they question exit examinations’ capacity to assess practical skills, contending that paper-based tests are inappropriate for gauging the presence of such abilities. Furthermore, detractors claim that if the tests are seen to constitute obstacles to job prospects, their impartiality may be called into doubt. They further contend that the exams may result in a glut of students who, should they fail them in large numbers, are left in a precarious situation. This could potentially embarrass the concerned higher education institution and the system, as well as push universities to take illegal actions in order to prevent such a spectre from materializing.
There is no reason to believe that the implementation of exit examinations for undergraduate university students would solve Ethiopia’s ongoing problems with low-quality higher education. In particular, the Ministry of Education has to make sure the plan doesn’t become just another failed solution that doesn’t address the sector’s many problems in a long-term way. All stakeholders must resist the temptation to promote a single initiative as a panacea and instead focus on finding comprehensive, long-term solutions that will allow policymakers to address the recurring quality issues that have plagued the system for far too long if confidence in the effectiveness and integrity of higher education is to be restored. In the meanwhile, careful thought should be given to easing the situation of students who did not pass the exit test and making sure that the money and effort invested in them do not go to waste. The startling exit test results serve as a warning that all Ethiopians should heed at their own risk.
